‘Political leadership may have changed, but the state still controls the narrative and excludes civil society’
CIVICUS discusses Botswana’s new government with Dumiso Gatsha, director of Success Capital, a local youth-led LGBTQI+ organisation.
Botswana’s 2024 election made history. The Botswana Democratic Party’s 58-year rule ended when the opposition Umbrella for Democratic Change coalition secured a shock victory. This shift was met with optimism, with many hoping to see progress on human rights, including LGBTQI+ rights and civil society freedoms. However, change has been slower than anticipated. While the election demonstrated the power of people’s participation, structural reforms remain stalled and civil society and excluded groups, including LGBTQI+ people, still face serious challenges.
Has the situation for civil society improved since the change in government?
Unfortunately, not much has changed. Even though the leadership has changed, the political system still operates much as it did before. The ruling coalition is split between traditional views and calls for progressive reform, making it difficult to move forward.
Many campaign promises have simply not been delivered. Commitments to abolish undemocratic institutions such as the Directorate of Intelligence and Security and the President’s Chief of Staff remain unfulfilled, while the vice president’s suggestion that he and the president might cut their salaries to save costs came to nothing. We’ve also seen an increase in specially elected councillors and a shift in foreign policy towards neutrality on Palestine. While these decisions fall within the president’s constitutional powers, they represent a selective use of these powers.
Meanwhile, civic space remains restricted. Records show that the Commissioner of Police has sought presidential guidance on handling protests, and in parliament, criticisms of the president have been struck from the official record, indicating increasing censorship and power centralisation.
Political leadership may have changed, but state institutions still control the narrative. We’ve experienced this first-hand. After we publicly criticised the presidency for using AI to respond to demands about gender-based violence (GBV) and advocated for greater inclusion of LGBTQI+ people and sex workers in international benchmarking commitments, our agreement with the National AIDS and Health Promotion Agency – which reports to the vice president – was abruptly cancelled.
What challenges does civil society face?
There’s growing frustration and fatigue among civil society organisations (CSOs). Although the government acknowledges the value of our work – particularly around gender justice, LGBTQI+ rights and public health – it rarely includes us in decision-making processes. Inter-ministerial committees on critical issues such as GBV and the rights of the Indigenous San people were formed without civil society input, while no formal consultations with CSOs have occurred under the current administration.
Structures meant to represent us don’t function independently either. The NGO Council is in practice part of the state, while the real umbrella body for civil society, the Botswana Council of NGOs, often aligns with funding streams rather than community needs. These platforms may appear inclusive from the outside but are deliberately structured to limit genuine participation.
Government support for CSOs has historically been tied to access to donor funding. Now that Botswana has been reclassified as an upper-middle-income country and faces budget constraints, these partnerships are weakening. The resulting reduction in funding has fostered competition among CSOs, undermining solidarity and independence across civil society.
Lack of transparency around public finances is also troubling. Levies on goods such as alcohol and plastics aren’t subject to parliamentary oversight, creating opportunities for corruption and political favouritism. Many political leaders run their own foundations, raising serious concerns about conflicts of interest.
People continue to be afraid to openly challenge the government. Media outlets are self-censoring and civil society voices are diminishing. Success Capital has recently experienced this first-hand.
What’s the situation for LGBTQI+ people?
Unfortunately, there has been no meaningful change because there’s a lack of political will to address LGBTQI+ issues and many CSOs remain silent, often due to dependence on government funding or internal struggles. The 2019 court ruling decriminalising same-sex relations was a key milestone, but our education, justice and healthcare systems continue to fail LGBTQI+ people, and no legal protections exist against discrimination or hate crimes.
LGBTQI+ people continue to face hate speech in public spaces and discrimination persists across multiple spheres, from the workplace to access to essential services and the legal system. For instance, I have three unresolved police cases, the oldest dating back more than six years.
What’s worse, technology has enabled new forms of harm. Online abuse and technology-driven GBV are increasing and mental health within the LGBTQI+ community is deteriorating. But leadership on these issues is absent and state institutions remain outdated and unresponsive.
How are LGBTQI+ activists responding?
Young LGBTQI+ people continue to speak out and organise despite the risks. At Success Capital, we take our advocacy directly to where people gather – bus stations, community meetings, markets – to counter disinformation and challenge harmful norms. We also maintain a presence in international policy forums where our government seeks legitimacy, using these platforms to remind leaders of their domestic responsibilities. Our intentionally disruptive work provokes backlash that confirms its impact.
To move forward, we urgently need equality and anti-discrimination laws, public commitments from the president and targeted support that reaches those most affected – including LGBTQI+ people with intersecting identities, such as those living with disabilities, members of ethnic minorities and young people excluded from education. Symbolic support isn’t enough. The election is over. Now it’s time for real action that improves people’s daily lives: not just those of the majority, but everyone’s.
The opinions expressed in this interview are those of the interviewee and do not necessarily reflect the views of CIVICUS.