MYANMAR: ‘Five years after the military coup, life for Rohingya people has worsened in almost every respect’
CIVICUS discusses the situation of Rohingya communities in Myanmar with Ro Maung Ming Shwe Jr, deputy executive director of the Comrades of Rohingya Youth, a youth-led civil society organisation that works to defend the human rights of Rohingya people and other ethnic communities in Myanmar.
Myanmar’s military has resumed large-scale operations in Rakhine State, nine years after it killed thousands of Rohingya people and forced around 730,000 into exile in Bangladesh. The military junta has been in power for over five years since its February 2021 coup. This latest escalation has reignited fear among Rohingya communities.
Why have airstrikes resumed, and who is affected?
The Arakan Army, an armed ethnic organisation, has expanded its control over significant parts of Rakhine State, challenging the authority of the Myanmar military. In response, the military has stepped up airstrikes and other operations to retake territory near the Bangladesh border.
Many Rohingya villages have become battlefields. Airstrikes, shelling and armed clashes are killing civilians and driving mass displacement. The destruction of homes and farmland has left many families without basic security, livelihoods and shelter.
Ongoing fighting has also cut off access to food, clean water, healthcare and medicine, deepening the humanitarian crisis. Active hostilities and access restrictions are making it difficult for humanitarian organisations to reach people in need.
Rohingya women and girls face heightened risks, including reports of conflict-related sexual violence. Armed groups, including the Arakan Army, have also forcibly recruited young Rohingya people, putting them in danger.
How has the situation changed since the coup?
The February 2021 coup plunged Myanmar into political instability, economic collapse and widespread armed conflict. Things got even worse this year when a military-dominated parliament elected Min Aung Hlaing president in April, following sham elections. He is the man many international observers hold responsible for the 2017 military campaign against Rohingya people, and he now leads the same military accused of mass killings, rape, forced displacement and other serious abuses. Justice through Myanmar’s legal and political institutions looks as distant as ever. For many Rohingya survivors, his presidency confirms that those responsible for atrocities are protected instead of punished.
Five years after the coup, life for Rohingya people has worsened in almost every respect, with rising insecurity, deeper poverty and continued violations of their human rights, including human trafficking, kidnapping, repeated displacement, sexual abuse and violence, and the threat of drone attacks. They are still denied citizenship and equal rights.
Many Rohingya people live in overcrowded displacement camps inside Myanmar or refugee camps in Bangladesh, where access to quality education, employment, healthcare and clean water is limited. This puts safety, justice and a dignified future further out of reach.
How is Comrades of Rohingya Youth supporting Rohingya communities?
We conduct research, field monitoring and community-based documentation of human rights violations against Rohingya communities, collecting, verifying and analysing information through community networks, survivor and witness testimonies and other evidence to publish accurate, evidence-based reports.
We also engage with local and international civil society groups to advocate for civilian protection, humanitarian access, justice, accountability and durable solutions for Rohingya refugees and displaced communities. Through in-person and online workshops, we present research findings, strengthen international partnerships and amplify the voices of Rohingya communities.
Although our primary focus is Rohingya people, we also advocate for and collaborate with other ethnic communities affected by conflict and human rights violations across Myanmar.
What difference could the recent genocide complaint filed in Indonesia make, and what else is needed for justice?
The genocide complaint against Min Aung Hlaing, filed by a Rohingya survivor in Indonesia, offers a path to justice that Myanmar’s institutions cannot. Independent investigation and prosecution at home remain unlikely, so Rohingya survivors and human rights groups have turned to international courts and foreign legal systems instead. The case reflects the Rohingya community’s determination to preserve evidence and ensure that alleged crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity and persecution are not forgotten. The legal process may be complex and take years, but it is already drawing international attention and pressure on Myanmar’s military leadership.
But accountability has to go further than one case. The international community must ensure that all those responsible for the 2017 genocide and other serious crimes against Rohingya people face credible, independent legal processes, delivering justice for victims and survivors. This means not only prosecuting those responsible, but also recognising the rights of Rohingya people, restoring their citizenship, ensuring safe and voluntary return for refugees and preventing future persecution.
The International Criminal Court and International Court of Justice must also investigate the reported mass killings and other serious violations committed against Rohingya civilians by the Arakan Army. Accountability efforts should focus on prosecuting individuals against whom there is sufficient evidence of responsibility for crimes against humanity, war crimes and other serious violations of international law.
For these efforts to succeed, states should cooperate with investigations, share evidence, support survivors and witnesses and ensure that accused people cannot escape accountability because of their political positions.
CIVICUS interviews a wide range of civil society activists, experts and leaders to gather diverse perspectives on civil society action and current issues for publication on its CIVICUS Lens platform. The views expressed in interviews are the interviewees’ and do not necessarily reflect those of CIVICUS. Publication does not imply endorsement of interviewees or the organisations they represent.